Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseRestricted to current Rensselaer faculty, staff and students. Access inquiries may be directed to the Rensselaer Libraries.
dc.contributorWen, John T.
dc.contributorBequette, B. Wayne
dc.contributorMishra, Sandipan
dc.contributorPeles, Yoav
dc.contributor.authorYang, Zehao
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T08:43:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T08:43:40Z
dc.date.created2017-01-13T09:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13015/1845
dc.descriptionDecember 2016
dc.descriptionSchool of Engineering
dc.description.abstractThe rapid development of high-power electronics results in high-heat-flux heat removal issues. Current cooling techniques with single-phase flow have low heat transfer coefficient and require large mass flow rate to meet the cooling needs, which results in the low energy efficiency of the cooling system. Vapor compression cycles (VCCs) that implement two-phase flow cooling and boiling heat transfer stand out as a promising solution candidate for this cooling issue. However, these cooling systems are highly susceptible to critical heat flux (CHF) during large transient heat loads and are nonlinear and heavily cross-coupled. This dissertation presents the designs of advanced controllers for VCCs subject to large transient disturbances. The main objective of these controllers is CHF avoidance. Different control strategies are used based on the knowledge of the heat-load disturbances. For unpredictable disturbances, a gain-scheduling controller with local robust controllers are used to address nonlinearity and cross-coupling inside the VCC; a static optimal feedforward controller is added to the gain-scheduling control to improve the disturbance rejection performance. For predictable disturbances, predictive controllers (model predictive control (MPC) and quasi-static predictive control) are used to preemptively lead the VCC to more advantageous operating points by improving the cooling capability of the VCC. The controller designs are validated using nonlinear simulation and experimental validation on a VCC testbed, and both results show clear improvements of the closed-loop over the open-loop operations. Predictive controllers show better disturbance rejection performance than feedback-feedforward controllers due to disturbance prediction and preparation.
dc.language.isoENG
dc.publisherRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
dc.relation.ispartofRensselaer Theses and Dissertations Online Collection
dc.subjectMechanical engineering
dc.titleAdvanced control of vapor compression cycle for large and transient heat flux removal
dc.typeElectronic thesis
dc.typeThesis
dc.digitool.pid177866
dc.digitool.pid177867
dc.digitool.pid177868
dc.rights.holderThis electronic version is a licensed copy owned by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Copyright of original work retained by author.
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.relation.departmentDept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record