Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND. Users may download and share copies with attribution in accordance with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 license. No commercial use or derivatives are permitted without the explicit approval of the author.
dc.contributorUchida, Shun
dc.contributorAbdoun, Tarek
dc.contributorZastavker, Yevgeniya, V.
dc.contributor.advisorBennett, Victoria Gene
dc.contributor.authorRichtarek, Alyssa
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T16:11:51Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T16:11:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13015/6129
dc.descriptionDecember 2021
dc.descriptionSchool of Engineering
dc.description.abstractGeotechnical engineering requires successfully interpreting field conditions to design an appropriate solution, but how engineers accrue the judgment required to make appropriate decisions is a research area still in its adolescence. Members of industry posit that engineering experience is essential for competent engineering practice and the development of this engineering judgment. Many undergraduate engineering courses and curricula are deficient in opportunities to acquire such experience. Building on previous work that shows students can learn through virtual experiences as well as in person experiences, the GeoExplorer project consists of mixed reality “mock internship” modules that allow students to get preliminary experience with field testing before ever stepping foot in the field. However, it is not entirely clear what kinds of experience build engineering judgment and defining engineering judgment in the context of practicing engineering does not immediately map to relevant competencies. To inform an assessment tool that serves students and educators in developing engineering judgment, other perspectives must be engaged. Looking at the overlap of accepted assessment of critical thinking competencies with those required for engineering judgment, as determined by practicing engineers, can be used to inform the development of engineering judgment. Focusing on the intersection of geotechnical engineering, engineering education, and game design, the newest GeoExplorer module is being designed to both develop and assess gains in engineering judgment. The distinguishing features between critical thinking and engineering judgment were used to begin developing a cogent definition of engineering judgment competencies and an effective means to assess these competencies in students within the context of the GeoExplorer modules.
dc.languageENG
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
dc.relation.ispartofRensselaer Theses and Dissertations Online Collection
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCivil engineering
dc.titleBeginning to develop and assess engineering judgment through mixed reality game-based learning
dc.typeElectronic thesis
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2022-09-15T16:11:54Z
dc.rights.holderThis electronic version is a licensed copy owned by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY. Copyright of original work retained by author.
dc.description.degreeMS
dc.relation.departmentDept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND. Users may download and share copies with attribution in accordance with a Creative Commons
                            Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 license. No commercial use or derivatives
                            are permitted without the explicit approval of the author.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND. Users may download and share copies with attribution in accordance with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 license. No commercial use or derivatives are permitted without the explicit approval of the author.