Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseRestricted to current Rensselaer faculty, staff and students in accordance with the Rensselaer Standard license. Access inquiries may be directed to the Rensselaer Libraries.
dc.contributorLokko, Mae-ling Jovenes
dc.contributorPerry, Chris (Christopher S.)
dc.contributor.advisorTsamis, Alexandros
dc.contributor.authorSolomonic, Jordan
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T22:07:36Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T22:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13015/6165
dc.descriptionAugust 2020
dc.descriptionSchool of Architecture
dc.description.abstractBiodiversity is declining at an alarming rate due, in part, to anthropogenic land use changes, while newly developed urban spaces continue to be utilized unjustly. As the proliferation of protected areas has been unable to combat the decline, and cities expand outward through the unequal and unsustainable conversion of former habitat, designers, architects, and planners will need to better incorporate ecological and social considerations into the built environment. While some social and ecological metrics are used to analyze and assess the built environment (LCA, S-LCA, EIA, SIA, ESIA), biodiversity and spatial justice metrics are notably absent from integrated assessment frameworks. In order to mitigate biodiversity loss and spatial injustice through architecture, impact assessment frameworks need to be adapted to help guide the design process toward positive socio-ecological outcomes. If we can better predict the outcomes of development, then we can build in better way. Using case studies from existing and speculative building interventions, a new social and ecological impact assessment framework for architecture has been proposed to predict and validate the effects of building through a recursive 5x5 decision-making process. The design of a case study integrates habitat for threatened chimney swifts and socially excluded people in the New York Metropolitan Area through low-cost multi-material additive manufacturing. Within a broader impact assessment framework, the design of this speculative case study is guided through GIS analysis for determining a site, embodied carbon reduction through finite-element structural analysis, and a novel hygrothermal analysis for both humans and chimney swifts. This comprehensive framework for design and analysis can help architects more easily build and validate high-positive-impact design interventions, and ultimately help bring about a world that is more just and conducive to life.
dc.languageENG
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
dc.relation.ispartofRensselaer Theses and Dissertations Online Collection
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.titleGenerative habitat : a socio-ecological design and assessment framework for architecture and development
dc.typeElectronic thesis
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2022-09-15T22:07:38Z
dc.rights.holderThis electronic version is a licensed copy owned by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY. Copyright of original work retained by author.
dc.description.degreeMS
dc.relation.departmentSchool of Architecture


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record