Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Qingpeng
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Daniel Dajun
dc.contributor.authorWang, Fei-Yue
dc.contributor.authorBreiger, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorHendler, James A.
dc.identifier.citationQ. Zhang, D. D. Zeng, F. -Y. Wang, R. Breiger and J. A. Hendler, "Brokers or Bridges? Exploring Structural Holes in a Crowdsourcing System," in Computer, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 56-64, June 2016, doi: 10.1109/MC.2016.166.en_US
dc.description.abstractA method to measure the contributions of crowdsourcing participants identifies how roles relate to an incident's investigation and discussion. Using data on the South China tiger incident, the authors evaluate the performance of brokers--those who connect separate groups within a platform and across platforms--and show how results compare with structural hole theory. The supplemental material at includes additional information about source data.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.titleBrokers or Bridges: Structural Holes in Crowdsourcing Systemen_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States